A probable historical period when under the circumstances particular personel skills were considered efficient for a society or country thus the society or country's tolerated and promoted such personel competition to enunciate internal stability and progress in the regional or international competition.
Usually changing Cilod are painful processes of changing classes' structure and redistribution of wealth thus wars, revolutions and group unrest have been a good indicator for changing Cilod. The approaching new Cilod is prompted by the new valued personel skills and knowledge needed under the new developments for a society or country to enunciate internal stability and progress internationally;
Trickle Up Poverty
Two things are of high significance at this time of change from one Cilod to another the Real Possibilities which reflect the socio-economic developments of a Cilod and also the Individuals Expectations which at time of change are getting higher: there is a relation between these two Relativities thus they normally intimately consequent one another: the expending Real Possibilities unlashes the constant personel Desires for greater leisure of competition: the general direction of such competition is directed by the Real Possibilities and the current at the time inherent spheres of competition: thus if we go back in history at feudal times the personel Desires were much separate from these in the 18 Century Empires of Europe and these from 20 Century Japan and even further separate from the Post Wars Most industrialized Countries;
The doctrine of the economy distinguishes and summarize these differences to show a very particular patterns in the world history which until now have been seen from other angles; by showing such changes it capitalizes of the permanently expanding role of the personel Intellectual Abilities and the new historical role they are to play in the permanently changing new world.
From another side if societies-countries do not adapt to the emerging new socio-economic accents they may loose competitiveness and even further disintegrate and come to be unstable.
Philosophy of the economy is a philosophical conception of locating the historical Cilod and the associated personel /for personel countries/ Current Levels of amelioration and thus showing a separate way of such evaluations from the used socio-economic philosophical conceptions up to date. This new way is progressively distinguishing itself from socio-economic ideologies, nationalism, racism or any products of the Scarce Resources Economics philosophies; it is founded on the most new socio-economic changes in the Worlds Markets and establishes a new conception for sustained market amelioration for the Most industrialized Countries and Blocks and for any other countries and even individuals into the new Globalizing market and World.
The history of the world is a history of changing priorities of the role of individuals in societies: the personel Desire to Compete for socio economic success as a natural human reaction in life and Societies' from other side have established cultural and regulatory systems to keep this competition under acceptable limits..
There are many faces of competition changing historically but the progression is traceable from more corporeal which dominated human relations throughout centuries toward a more intellectual exploding sharply in the new history: The personel Competition for economic and group status well established and distinguishable in the most industrialized countries and markets has been growing into a Global competition as a consequent of new political and economic Global situation and the intellectualization of this competition. The significance of the Intellectual property and Intellectuality over all has grown from internal for the most industrialized countries to international. The power of this kind of competition is fueled by the Internet and the political freedoms colse to the world allowing communications, free travel and allembracing free firm relations. The power of personel corporeal competition has been loosing essence and the personel intellectual competition has been gaining power. These changes could be traced historically from the time of the primitive societies, countries and empires when personel corporeal force has been loosing significance to personel organizational ones when skills and knowledge has been gaining importance: thus the values of what was prominent one time was not very much that prominent another time. As an example with the inventions of more distant weapons corporeal overpowering lost its importance. This process of intellectualization of priorities has been at its best for the last 100 years in the most industrialized societies and countries which obviously had established the best environment for the most adventitious tendencies to materialize. Declines of ones and changes of power from a country or a region to another almost all the time is a consequence of pour adaptability to the newly developing priorities of the change of one Cilod with another. In the past these processes of changes were much slower pace then new ones therefore some societies, countries, empires in the past existed for centuries without changes; now days' changes are very quick so countries adopt their laws and regulations quite often to enunciate stability.
The discount to personel to compete in societies has expended for a short time as never before by overpowering the existing ideologies and classes' structures.
When man reads about competition as the way societies were formed and built it starts finding like a jungle out there but in reality life is not a jungle because of human culture and religions, these group tools are for balancing civility and retention Individuals close to God and almost all religions have been promoting modesty and distinct for the societies values?
Human culture has been built by accumulating human caress and retaining group rules which have come to be part of daily theory for acceptable personel behavior.
Social inequalities and the negative group powers coming from the socio-economic injustice have been offset by individuals accepting the realities of such group injustice by the group Order. The negative energies as a consequent of ongoing group injustice have been redirected into basic nationalism and chauvinism or into more sophisticated ideologies of communism or capitalism, or religious fundamentalism. The suppression of individuals by the governments to protect the higher more adventitious classes is the way how modern societies were built; this was the way to enunciate group Stability and ultimately for the most industrialized nations to enunciate their status. Ever until most new developments in the Global economy for societies to be prosperous they must had been Socially garage and such was succeeded by the mixture of free market and group order we have to differentiate group Order from market Order which is a generally socio-economic tool becoming inherent as a consequence of the new technological-political-global market integration and acceleration. group Order had been ruling the societies up to now, a consequence of the pro provide economies based on scarce resources under low productivity and international aggression group Order's doctrine was therefore to limit the personel competition for socio-economic success to dinky number of individuals who controlled big businesses and majority share of the national wealth; an coming quite beneficiary in such an environment. group Order was needed to suppress a pointless for the Cilod personel competition thus the societies could balance the deficiencies of low productivity and technologies, part of the group Order included also the classes branch and constant wars and imperialistic aggression: which impact on the societies was similar: to enunciate group Stability. Mostly corporeal competition with low productivity, and international instability were to be offset by the group Order and its Socio-Economic Tools.
Socio-economic structures of the Most industrialized Nations under such environment reflected at its best such limitations and at the same time gave opportunities of more then the Less industrialized Nations individuals to share in the socio-economic competition; the group Order suppressed the personel competition using socio-economic tools the market Order suppresses personel competition using market tools; market Order is a consequence of intellectual competition of the globalizing world allembracing plays similar to the group Order role but it is based on Current market Limitations: those limitations are pretty much a request to provide relativity called market Relativity: the all the time ranging market forces, progressively expanding market of personel Competition will break the existing group Order in the Most industrialized Markets and grow up into a market Order into these Markets relativity which will progress and grow up into a global relativity of a Global Market..
The Global Intellectualization brings on a Global scale much separate environment that substantially differs from the currently existing market environment; such change will consequent all spheres of firm and opportunity Economics fundamentally:
Let's collate this new amelioration on the Global marketplace to the braking of royalties in Europe after the great wars or to the dismembering of the Great Empires.
There will be two main factors of Globalization: one is the Global Intellectualization of Competition and second is the Global Integration of Investment. And because the improving access of personel competition medium to small companies and personel investors will be able to directly invest and provide services or product colse to the globe which by itself will limit the currently existing Global corporations to services and products requiring bigger resources to develop: some of the new firm and investment conglomerates will adapt under the new conditions other will disappear but they will loose the grip on the international market to the medium to small businesses and investors as these last flexibilities and adaptabilities will provide them with major advantages.
Employment market will transform from full time employment into free lance employment. Actually, self-employment will come to be major employment globally.
In this kind of socio-economic environment the role of the governments in Economics will change from historically protecting higher classes and big firm to regulatory of protecting free market competition.
Global terrorism is most by all means; of course the biggest threat to the market and intellectual globalization: it is the new menace of the future, but I believe if the market soldiery are let to work the abilities of the religious fundamentalists to recruit will be much more limited. Current isolation from fair competition of millions of population colse to the world has brought wars and revolutions and finally it has brought the Global terrorism and religious fundamentalism. There is an International Level of Expectations which also is traceable historically which off balance all the time provoke rebellious motions. The inherent Current International Level of amelioration based on the current technological and socio-economic structures allows much more progress structures of spellbinding more individuals into efficient competition. The current Level of Expectations reflects the disharmony between possibilities population feel it, it is out there and the suppression of the individuals from participating in it provokes resistance; religious fundamentalists are just using this in their ways to steer troubles. If current governments of the Most industrialized Countries and Economic Blocks do not issue the pressure and institute a fair personel market competition the consequences could be disastrous. Historically the most new situation in the world is comparable to the fall of world great Spanish and Austro Hungarian empires when they could not adopt to the new developing conditions; to the Russian revolution and First and Second Great Wars: all the time in each of these occasions a serious socio-economic amelioration could be traced where the personel Expectations for /fair/ Competition to a Cilod were not met, and group pressure erupted into violence. It is also distinct that these processes have been accelerating and changes are more frequent now days. The World is becoming a boiling place of energies and personel expectations are running higher and higher. There is a great opportunity these energies to be used in a creative competing environment if Most industrialized Countries' Governments promote these new tendencies and generally population understand that the old Economics of Scare Resources is expiring when a market driven pro balance between request to provide Economics is emerging. Life as it is today will give place to these new developments.
Why Ideologies are not relevant anymore on the Global market place?
Well, ideologies and nationalism served well Most industrialized Countries through History by maintaining group Stability and as motivation group tool for their citizens, also as a tool of propaganda of their values. Obviously the values of the Most industrialized Countries especially at the last 50 years have been most of the time more progressive promoting pro personel freedoms and open markets which by itself had had a distinct consequent on the Global scale. Before this they were much more protective of their own interests; imperialism and militarism were part of it: at that time the Global market did not almost exist except for them and the productivity was such low that appropriation of foreign resource was pretty much the only way for gaining economic and political power, therefore militarism, imperialism and economics were very well embodied together. In any point in History the most industrialized societies have in some way been progress of the rest so if some methods or policies we now think inhumane and unacceptable, at the time there were justifiable to enunciate dominance. In the modern history as it was mentioned before so many times political leaders misunderstood the reality and currently most efficient socio-economic tools and raged wars, genocide and devastation: examples are countless such as Germany and Japan in the Second World War and Russia and China through the Cold War. Ideologies and mindless waist of resources in the last Century were synonymous. The politicians and lobbyists have been the best promoters of ideologies because these were serving them the most. In new times in the Most industrialized Countries anti corruption and pro humane politics is expanding which is a part of the coming new level of development. Same tendencies of cleaning the financial sector are in progress where tolerance for shadow operations and transactions is decreasing. The expectations for politicians and firm leaders' behavior and actions by the group are demanding. Ideologies are loosing their impact on foreign and domestic policies until the September, 11 2001 which terrorist act was followed by revival of new wave of ideologies; Religious fundamentalism from one side with its seemingly irrational demands and propaganda and the Us and other Most industrialized Countries Governments from another side locating a new purpose to exist and acceptable more powers over the individuals' freedoms. Governments strive on ideologies which is a best weapon to illustrate mismanagement and mistakes by them. Terrorism is probably the biggest set back in the post war history, even bigger then the Cold war because then the enemies were known and there ware political exchanges between them when the terrorism is an inexpressive resistance with no clear cause and unrealistic demands.
What has prompted this new level of amelioration and why it is separate from the former ones?
The change from a Scarce Resources Economics to a market Economics has begun with the revising of the socio-economic structures which have given the fields for technological and political revolutions: the values of the free market competition and the personel freedoms have been penetrating country after country and even in some like China personel freedoms are still far from perfect just the leisure to do firm has open a lot of doors for personel competition; the Internet and the capability of more individuals to share in virtual educational programs or to self educate, and to exchange ideas and thoughts; the political leisure of the Eastern Block countries which followed up by some of them becoming members of Ec; country like Bulgaria has virtually built up a crediting theory overnight with predicted annual growth; the suited intellectual revolution in India which enhanced schooling and high tech employment, the politically garage governments in South America and Asia, and the most prominent the first time in history decentralization of the global investment and the intellectual competition which has come with the internet and which could not be controlled by only industrialized Countries and Blocks or by other Governments.
Life as it was is gone: in the new World the most progress countries and blocks will be the one which value personel freedoms and intellectual properties. The most vital resources are not scarce anymore because they are Intellectual and if some of the richest men on the planet are getting there using Intellectual properties obviously the price of becoming wealthy and prosperous does not anymore relates manufacturing, or providing services or even financing firm there are higher businesses and they are the intellectual properties associated ones. The materialization of row ideas is becoming very fast which by the way is going to be the firm of the time to come itself. From ideas to materialization back to ideas: permanently improving technologies in all spheres.
What becomes priority for a country if it is to enunciate or perform most industrialized status?
The way individuals compete for status countries and economic blocks compete too; may be in some time to come it will change when the individuals will come to be dominant in this competition but this is still in the time to come for now countries will compete for domination.
Us Scarce Resources Economics and the capitalistic group doctrine was based on the competition and relatively free unregulated market and a government protecting and promoting the status quo of classes' branch and big firm limiting group investment and wealth redistribution as firm not friendly economic tools which theory was very progress for its time placing Us on the top of the Most industrialized Countries now with the newer changes of priorities such success will be achieved by adjusting to the new occurrences and developments of the market Relativity by providing more personel to
· access to best education,
· best group conditions of daily life,
· personal freedoms,
· improving and maintaining infrastructure in particular communications and group transportations,
· environmentally friendly energies and products,
· racial and lower classes integration, leisure of firm but very correct firm regulatory theory against corruption and fraud:
· expending normally adjusted to the inflation group security and Medicare
· heavily regulated stock and commodity exchanges expending Globally
· Associating countries colse to the World in integrated firm and investment under the same regulatory system.
All of this could be summarized with market Stability of the market Economics which is replacing the group Stability of the Scarce Resources Economics.
To operate a pro group theory without socializing the economics and creating huge bureaucracy a country must use the new tools of economics and monetary policies.
There is a change in valuation of equity: the new security coming off a regulated and in the same time ever expending markets provides more security of more assets considered equities then the old system. To think an asset equity it must have relative security; when the theory of Scarce Resources Capitalism relied on deregulations to stimulate firm and at the same time created insecurity and this coming devaluated assets and the value of the whole country as all. Changing the theory will change the securities and allow expansion of the current Monetary policies without devaluation of the currencies; and when such approaches is applied on a Global scale it becomes scary expandable.
What about if such prosperity duplicate and triple the world population and creates food and other shortages and environmental disasters?
It is a very legit request and for this we can go even back to Socrates with him asking if an educated personel is a best personel and the reply could be "no" may be not, but historically the biggest damages to the environment and the overpopulation has all the time been done by less industrialized and leisure deprived nations and even in the most industrialized one the urbanization normally reduced the number of children per family, the schooling or as we can say the intellectualization of more population and the new opportunities spellbinding these population in the Global competition will perhaps cut the risk form overcrowding or environmental disasters then increase the current one.
The market Stability is not vital that garage do not be leaded by the terminology; volatility in the worlds markets will not cease to exist in the contrary the regulations needed to enunciate market Stability will increase the reliability of the exchanges that by itself will accelerate Global investment allembracing expanding the current trading values complicated times: the more allembracing and trustworthy data in case,granted by the companies and brokerages will encourage more investors to step in on a Global scale: fraud is the main conjecture a lot of investors even today to not trade; and finally, the new monetary policies of the market Stability will increase the Monetary Supplies obviously putting more money out there for trading.
If M supplies are increased would it not provoke inflationary soldiery and devaluation of the currencies?
The quantities of Monetary provide in a market Stability Competition is based on a separate formulas accumulating request to provide ratios /not other way around/ where the request is a allembracing break down of market tools mental the estimation of the currency; market value of a currency will reflect the distinct circulation of it /the currency/ which is based on the consequent value per unit: lets make an example if you turn colse to 1$ under a fair market competition and its value becomes in one month the an further .50 could be put in circulation without provoking inflationary or deflationary forces: until now the corporeal value of a country such as real estate equity, the final manufacturing and services output equity and savings equity which are mostly reflection of somehow corporeal proprietary of a sort and low Ltv of the intellectual properties and investment have measured the Monetary Policies and this is because the value of the currencies was measured by these kind of equities but in the market Stability Economics there will be more secured tools of economics providing value and therefore the perception for equity will change; such new tools are the investment in intellectual properties /the intellectual property equity/, in Regional and Global amelioration /the investment equity/, the firm value which on a Regional and Global scale /the firm equity/, a Country Infrastructure, a country Medicare infrastructure and etc. Are considered equity too: all of these partially are considered economic tools now but because of the limitations of the market security even internally because of the ongoing non transparency risky approaches of the current exchanges and the Government deficit, and allembracing high insecurity their Ltv or Money to Value are very low. Again market Stability Economics is based on high Global increase which will raise the margins and on very heavy market regulations minimizing fraudulent practices and therefore providing higher security on more Intellectual and investment equities therefore the value of the intellectual properties and of the invested capital will be considered higher Ltv and Mtv equity. These new equity will change the Monetary policies and the coming toward inflationary and deflationary soldiery as well; therefore more money will circulate and more firm will be done over all, much more. Anyone that contributes to a distinct market competition will be considered "equity" and could be supported by the Monetary Policies. Finally, the distribution of Wealth under the new conditions will differ substantially from the current one: the intellectualization of personel competition will give the opportunities to millions of population to share in a Global competition; best organized and well maintained Small to Medium Businesses and Investor will advantage substantially from such developments therefore a lot of industries which could be done by using new technologies will progress indiscriminately but some of the firm still be done by the internationals, anyway self-employment and free lancing will be expanding share on the employment market..
How the economics is changing from manufacturing and assistance associated into intellectual and investment related?
Simply here is an example: "If one has adequate security in a Latin American country to buy a well located property or invest into medium to small firm the value of such investment coming from Us could be complicated time as the value of a similar investment here in Us because of the unlikeness revenue generating and acceptable of life. The return on a firm in this area collate to the invested capital is higher too. The missing link is market security in this Latin American Country" well the same example applies to local Us securities: the shady speculative practices by the current regulations stop many investors from using the tools of investment for behalf thus many are doing their own small enterprises in many cases not relating their caress and education. Small investors are feeling very insecure on the current market exchanges as well.
The Scares' Resources doctrine of the capitalism is pro provide emphasizing on the firm side; supported by politicians and lobbyists this ideology still rules: the fragmental firm regulations and requirements bring the worst in many firm population and businesses. The Scares' Resources Ideology capitalize on such shady practices as stimulating firm and over all economy: so called Trickle Down Economics thus Economic flexibilities is maintained by cutting employees benefits and insurance, by relocating or even worse as Enron by skimming billions but allembracing it is best for business; From another side the Socialized Economics of many countries basically entitling Governments to distribute high percentages of their Gnp's shows very inflexible and insufficient structures product of Scares' resources ideologies too, in this case protecting the societies from personel competition: in this kinds of Economics doing firm is very difficult and very risky.
Market Stability Economics is a free market competition under heavy tasteless law regulations: the overhead operate shall be done by the federal courts when the Government shall be represented by the district attorneys. The current Tax theory should be simplified whether by across the board Sales Tax or very straightforward Federal Tax; the Globalization of the market will be best controlled by a Sales Tax. The labor laws should be simplified promoting self employment thus the contracts should be enforceable with no large expenses: beyond doubt a whole number of laws should regulate the warding and structure of all firm contracts to make them easy enforceable, the payments of contracts should be beyond doubt enforceable with a full recourse to the company's officers. The theory should be enforceable Globally as said before which should not differ in any way from all participants. All rules must be fair to all participants.
The major unlikeness of the new theory is that the internal for Us regulation have to apply Globally thus no country should be allowed to share on the Us market without full yielding similar to the practices of Eu expansion under the tasteless rules and regulations. The biggest mistake Nafta made is not requiring from Mexico to consequent the same regulations as the Us companies did. As an example of right policies was the requested by Eu to all candidate members to adapt numbers laws and regulations from anti corruption ones to anti pollution and power preservation ones. Which policies is helping those countries to institute more garage markets and these policies have already lifted multi times the International investment to those candidate and new members countries. Eu in the other side has shown an anti firm bureaucracy and also a growing segregation between having and having not nations; nationalism and chauvinism are and will be the biggest obstacle toward adapting the market Stability Economics. Us are much more industrialized in integrating all kinds of population in its market.
The new market Stability driven Economics cleaned up from firm irregularities, shadow practices and violent market fluctuation should be more efficient for firm and individuals alike: the upcoming Intellectual Revolution will open a new world of opportunities for many new population currently non productive: this new access will issue some negative pressures and tendencies which will decrease the recruiting powers of the Religious fundamentalists or mindless fruitless ideologies. The process of these new tendencies to progress and realize themselves should be quite prompt if the new policies started being adapted by the Most industrialized Countries and Markets. The fierce economic competition among these countries and economic blocks will not relinquish anyhow and there will not be any peace in the Global economic competition, the main unlikeness of the new developments are best regulated economics which will higher the security of investment and intellectual properties, and firm practices, it will allow a smother process of globalization, it will allow more peoples and countries to share in the global competition, it will institute a best peaceful World by limiting the powers of the fundamentalism and other negative group ideologies.
doctrine of the cheaper Part Two
Post a Comment