Plan
Chapters:
Trickle Up Poverty
1. Introduction.
2. History of amelioration
3. Levels of Development: distinctive points, changes and presume for changes
4. Religious doctrine of amelioration
5. Science of mind of amelioration
6. Group changes and consequences of amelioration
7. Nationalism, Ideologies and Political Systems enforcing them.
8. Economy and market Forces: Historical amelioration
9. Globalization and consequences
10. Most developed Countries separate approaches in the contemporary world
11. From struggle to survive among individuals, societies, countries, blocks of a pro provide Economy to a Regulated pro equilibrium between provide and examine Economy
12. Life in contemporary developed Countries
13. Group tools of acceleration and deceleration.
Chapter I - Introduction
The Globalization has become an irreversible historical process permanently expanding and evolving at the same time the Group and economic conditions in the most developed nations have succeeded raising productivity and attention of capital. The old tools of Economics cannot anymore adapt these new developments and are not able to make most favored conditions for such an foremost to the World and for any private countries new amelioration to evolve smoothly by avoiding major economical crises and without destroying the environment. Having inadequate economical Tools creates evaporative market conditions which work in conflict with current possibilities of market expansion: this investigate is to proof the change from a Scarce Economics based on evaporative interest rates fluctuations and deregulated speculations into a market Economics based on market stability, regulated economics and Global Expansion of even small to medium size businesses and investors.
With the current system of Economics even the very resilient Us Economy will not be able to maintain the ravaging military of shrinking behalf margins and market crashes. It has become inevitable for a firm to verbalize its profitability it must go Global /also National for Us and Eu/: but the Medium to Small companies and Investors are hardly capable going global in a highly deregulated markets and exchanges.
There are great possibilities in a Global scale for establishing a heavy regulated but at the same time free market place where more individuals from elsewhere will be able to compete in very expanding intellectual competition; this process could be accelerated by expanding the security of doing firm and investing capital which will growth the Ltv and Mtv of the assets and even further to heighten some currently carefully liabilities or with very microscopic Ltv and Mtv. When doing that the Monetary policies will change because of this extra security so more money will be able to circulate without provoking inflation; then more firm and venture will effect and gently these rules and regulations will envelope more markets around the Globe to make a Global market Place for even Medium to Small firm and Investors having such Global access.
This is the end of the shady Trickle Down Economics or the bureaucratized Socialized Economics and the starting of a real market Economics /called by me a market Stability Economics/ because it relies on the market Competition and on Regulated firm Practices and Direct and Indirect venture under clearly stated laws and regulations implemented by the Governments but controlled by the Courts.
All these is becoming potential only in the very modern times by the startling developments of the Internet, associated technologies and communications; the fall of the Eastern Communist Block, the expansion of the European Union, the entering of Wto by China and by the expending free time of firm all over the Globe which as a consequence increased Global Productivity, access to the market Place, quick jump from Ideas to Realization, opening the Global Employment Market, allowing expanding Global Direct Investment, allowing Internet study and Self Education. The World has changed forever.
The following is a Philosophical plan attempting to substantiate the new changes straight through Historical sequence of developments and conclusions.
Economy is one of the reasons setting our life in motion and moderating our personal desires and behavior with yielding with the Group rules of club to perform highly sophisticated structures of societies and countries and lately economic blocks.
Many historical occurrences could be explained by the Economics and the ways individuals and societies are affected by it. The competition among individuals for economical and political advance in any community which competition has grown into Global has always been the way bringing innovations, improvements and advance but in the same time bringing corruption, injustice and the following revolutions and terrorism.
The private Desire for Success and the following competition among individuals is in the starting of relations between individuals and societies as a general driving force which organized societies into countries, empires and economic blocks. A constant struggle between the interests of the community and private interests is regulated by cultural and religious rules and base laws which moderate and leverage this association so the societies could function.
Historically the competition for success has moved from more primitive and corporal one using more corporal tools and methods for success to more intellectual and abstract one using more intellectual methods for success. So consequently of such changing priorities the Group rules of behavior have changed accenting on these permanently evolving values.
Economy is a main field for individuals' competition and also a general tool for comparison among societies; it has been evolving and changing with the new values invoked by the the general intellectualisation. Relativity of a community or group of societies to adjust their values straight through rules and base laws to fit a Current International Level of Development-Cilod is called Country's /for this society/ Current Level of Development- Cclod. This philosophical law of Group Relativity Sr is to be established based on historical statistics and recipe of comparisons. Every singular occasion in history has its Cilod and every community has its Cclod at any time of its existence.
Why are we attempting to figure out the relativity of historical economic and Group development?
The up to now marginal understanding of the processes of human amelioration by the Religious doctrine over all has being limiting the abilities of separate societies to find for themselves best ways for development: thus ideologies such as pro Capitalistic or pro Socialistic, or pro religious Fundamentalistic have been playing role in preventing Religious doctrine to clear the values and reasons for socio-economic advance and development. The disconnection between Religious doctrine and Economics for some time has fragmented general abilities for comprehending a conclusive system of assessment and consequential objectivism. Economics has drifted away from philosophical plan to a practical science of statistics and ideological self-adjustments. The desire of practical clearance of ideas has taken over philosophical reevaluations of sometimes subjective values. In context of such ideological more like status quo science of contemporary Economics real historical possibilities have been sidelined and obscured as not complying with the "political correctness" and its accents. The same coming legitimately applies to the ways separate tools of Economics have been evaluated and used however under economic and Group pressures Economics has been evolving an examples is the change form the Gold maintain backed currencies in the past to the more abstract current system.
The assessment of the basic inflationary processes, the most modern effect of high tech developments, Internet and Worldwide Political liberalization causing fast Globalization; even the past changes from Farming driven Economics to Manufacturing Economics and now to Services and venture Economics have been poorly evaluated not followed into conclusions and effect resolutions which is to bring a coherent philosophical systems to recap these changes and provide guidelines to the Future; the understanding of Economic and Group tools historically has been very fragmented over the board.
The consequence of such insufficient approaches toward Economics have been many wars, revolutions, totalitarian dictatorships,depressions and most recently the rise of religious fundamentalism and terrorism. One will say that I am going too far in giving the Economics such powers: he or she could be right there are political situation driven by Group military not relating Economy on their face but beyond any socio ideological motion stay pressures of Group expectation of inevitable values and motivations and such pressure is still a product of individuals' desire for competition which was steered to ideological values because of lock of economic competition for majority of individuals to participate, and because governments' role have always been to defend the status quot of socials structures the energies which could be used for such economic competition have been flown into nationalism, racism, chauvinism and the general ideologies as well
If in prospective we evaluate the economic and Group reasons for the Second World War as an example when the plan of imperialism at the time by Hitler and by any world powers that appropriating foreign resources and occupying others' assets was carefully equitable when if a detail assessment is done these neighboring countries could have been much more useful as trading partners which you can see in the new developments in Europe; Such an example of conceptual misunderstanding of economic and Group tools by all of the great powers and Nazi Germany was a effect of this mindless war which did not do any good to anyone but after the devastation it made clear that unleashing the dark powers of individuals' powers instead of using their creativity is worthless. In the new world of rising terrorism such misunderstanding of reality by the Most developed Countries' Governments could have fatal consequences for any country or even for the World. To try to suppress millions of population living in poverty and religious fanaticism is not a feasible way to go send into a new world when the possibilities of the Current International Level of amelioration to engage Worldwide individuals into a effective competition are real; denials of opening these opportunities by the Most developed Countries based on ideologies such as status quo Us capitalism or in case Chinese socialism, or European Group bureaucratism, or nationalism, or anyone prejudice will only bring tensions, insecurity and environmental disasters..
One will say if there are too many economic and Group factors to be put together in a way which can provide ample evaluation, is it correct?
Yes if the data is accumulated with no correct guidelines. In case the system of this plan is simplicity: not ignoring any major factors for socio-economic amelioration but concentrating on the guiding ones that have the most effect on the projected development.
How competition could be carefully main engine of private and Group relations and development?
There are countless numbers of original and circumstantial factors in an private life which play roles in characterizing this private and his/her correlations and Group interactions. The economic factors are microscopic but very foremost part of this process. The conditions in which an private grows up, the stability of day to day life, the possibilities in front of him/her, the inevitable and negative pressures on him/her by the society; obviously negative economic pressure could have very depressing and mind altering effect on ones character; the lock of opportunities could conduce to ones instability and perplexities. Historically ideologies, religions, nationalism and general culture have helped offset the instability the lock of socio-economic opportunities to the majority. The Group structures have established an array of tools to suppress private Desire for Competition which suppression `historically has been antagonistic based on classes', nationality and other belongings to limit majority of individuals from competing for socio-economic advance. But in a world of low productivity and political chaos such limits of competition ware legitimately inevitable for the stability and the survival of these societies
The main competition for private success has changed not only from corporal to intellectual but also from very microscopic opportunities for singular classes to more general and accessible; this process of opening of socio-economic competition to higher division of the population is at its best in the Most developed Countries which historically have always been the most advance socio-economically thus at any Pclod the Cclod of the Mdc is basically a effect the best adaptability of this country or block at the historical occasion to use in a better way Current Possibilities' potentials of their citizens in the most effective at this occasion ways. Because in separate historical moments separate socio-economic structures were working best, examples: the Roman Empire's strong militaristic coming supported by political power needed militaristic club and Group Religious doctrine to dominate the current World thus Roman structures were best reflecting the Pclod and therefore Rome dominated the known world she was the best adapted under the circumstances. Other examples are aged Persia, China, and Aztecs in the Americas.
Obviously to base this philosophical closing on the coming of evaluating these historical changes the continuity and relativity of these changes have to establish: and it may be best presented as a change of socio-economic Religious doctrine and Science of mind from pro corporal pro hand-operated one reflecting at the time hand-operated labor economic coming as dominating to a pro intellectual one apprehended by the developing high technologies and economic globalization one when intellectual economic coming is dominating. This socio-economic evolution is reflected into historical changes; here it needs to be mentioned that they were periods in the World history when these processes of intellectualization were severely interrupted and even reversed an example are the Dark Ages in Europe, or the Mao's governing of China the changes are not essential a flowing continuation but more like a spiral like continuation.
Someone will say that this Religious doctrine replicate Marxism for these population my respond is that Marxism was based on amelioration based on struggle between the having and having not classes when this Religious doctrine of the Economy is based on the historical continues change of historical priorities from corporal to intellectual. Which I believe has given the opening of the human civilization to advance. So as an example when technologies and socio-economic structures were underdeveloped appropriating foreign resources was the only way was a country to advance into interstates competition therefore the best organized countries were establishing their empires by concurring others and imperialistic foreign policies were supporting them: in such socio-economic environment individuals' competition was redirected into militaristic by nationalism and ideologies private Desire for advance was obviously associated to private advance by militaristic ways. The same principle of timely foremost values applies to pre historic times when instead the club militaristic skills of the time of the empires, personal corporal personal vigor had been much more essential therefore the "heroes" from the aged Greek mythology were compared and associated to the gods. When Great Empires before the Great Wars of the 20th Century were occupying the known World the mentality of conquest and spread of civilization was reflected in the literature, economics and science of that time to clarify their policies fierce nationalism and chauvinism were promoted by the Governments and other institutions: "the Religious doctrine of being better meant being militarily stronger, and even on a base level that a man is not one unless going straight through the army" ready individuals for the armies and multiple devastating wars. Now days such "philosophy" sounds almost comical; population have understood the consequences of wars and they are used only under greatest circumstances.
Throughout history continues accumulated data was needed for victorious competition which is another factor for arrival to a new Current International Level of Development. Such higher ground can be reached only by expanding and enhancing current possibilities which always are a effect of enhancing economies and political structures. On the ground base enhancing technologies, trade relations and firm environment in any time of history had prompted a new Cilod.
When productivity was low classes based on individuals' background and individuals' access to resources and position in the community have been playing dominant role in societies around the world. Because of the low productivity to verbalize "normal" level in the community multiple servants and feudal taxes were needed. Thus the system of scarce resources was born. To suppress individuals for demanding more participation in economic competition a Religious doctrine of servitude and tyranny of oppression was established: all over the world.
The negative socio-economic pressures on individuals accumulated in such conditions normally brought rebellions and revolutions therefore societies needed release valves: the nationalism, chauvinism, xenophobia, religious hatred have simply been parts of such Group negative built up releasing system which was promoted by government and negative Group pressures were channeled into regional wars and constant insecurity.
The next and higher step in this Group arresting system were the ideologies which were higher more sophisticated level of prejudice: in both systems of negative pressure releases any individuals not complying with the "acclaimed" ideas were persecuted and carefully asocial and sometimes even enemy of the states: ideas for righteousness fitting some current criteria have been used and continued to being used for the same purposes even to promote belonging to causes and system to suppress private desire for success.
The system of Scarce Resources has being based on a pro provide economics and competition it reflects the allowed by this plan microscopic percent of individuals access to fair competition which is accessible mostly for the upper classes who control big firm and venture in now days. The Scarce Resources Economics along with access to good education, to borrowing Capital, to market exchanges investing is pro provide and the provide has been controlled by the big firm and large venture groups and their strong lobbyists; the Governments have been part of this system by promoting their interests.
Us is a exquisite example how this plan works where good schools are quite costly and the system of income based study is dominant: which system was probably good for a steady developing Us Economy and not so good for the rapidly developing global market which promotes separate kind of competition by globalizing the labor market so the large corporation are looking elsewhere for marvelous scientists and technicians, following on such examine large Us Universities responded by creating graduate programs in science where high % Phd graduates are of foreign origin. Same plan prompted whole of software specialists and healing doctors to come from India and elsewhere to fill the existing examine in Us. So far firm Graduate Schools even opening some competition are lingering behind relying on the more conservative and seemingly less demanding firm competition as still a steady place for the upper classes kids to be promoted but with the Europeans and Chinese's high accessibility for commoners to all strong undergraduate educational programs and the becoming highly sophisticated Global firm a examine for highly intellectual firm managers will drive firm Schools toward similar to the science faculties global approaches of admittance and scholarships.
The Religious doctrine of Scarce Resources doesn't reflect the examine for allowing more access to competition in order a community to keep up with the global development. Obviously Us Economy is based on provide and examine adjustments therefore finally the most advance individuals are to effect but when the educational system limits lower classes from stimulating study the potentials of many capable individuals have not being enhanced properly will bring disadvantage to Us Economy as a whole. The system of Capitalism is based on ideology not on reality and therefore it is bound to change or Us will lose its Most developed Country's superiority.
The ideological status quo for government to protect and promote big firm and large venture by closing eyes of shady firm and venture practices commonly lower the security of the assets in Us which hits on the diminishing value of the dollar and the gradual changing venture to more carport foreign markets of Europe and China where pro Group distribution of wealth creates "stable" demand. Which systems by the way are not sufficient and flexible at all but on the principle of "the least evil" work better. Here it must be made clear that Religious doctrine of the Economy's market Stability Economics is not based of socialization of Economics and Governmental redistribution of wealth but it is based on a heavily regulated firm and venture structures and growth the equity of Us infrastructures and Group expenditures such as Medicare and Group security which security will growth the value of the Us Economy ample and maintain its status as a Most developed Economy and Market.
Historically, the upper classes security was general because in a system of Scarce Resources the statuesque has had progressive effect on the Economy by creating relative market stability. The qoute with this system as with all systems of selective access to competition is the ongoing globalization where Us market could not be carefully anymore above others and untouchable. Eu, India and China are entering this competition which used to be regional for Us market development it a global competition. Big firm and investors are exciting their operations elsewhere and the process will accelerate.
To not loose competitiveness Us Economy must adapt under these new developments and capitalize of and promote the advances in communications and other spheres of technologies, of the Us infrastructure, Group services and Medicare, educational system in singular highly developed graduate schools and promote their expansion, the globalization of the very flexible Us firm and promote access to global markets for medium to small companies and investors; which actions will make a more open competition for more individuals to participate and the strengths of the Us free market competition will advance and be empowered.
The Us educational system is one example of based on ideology system, but the Us graduate studies universities are adapting into these new global competition and finally the flexibilities of the Us interest driven study will prevail to verbalize its high status by accepting more foreign students. The looser will finally be the lower and middle class Americans being isolated from the global competition.
What is legitimately changing historically and could it be carefully a new development?
Very simple:
1. The pro provide trickle down or socialistic economics are changing in a pro market stability economics 2. The enhancing high technologies, the globally expanding firm freedom, the access of capital medium to small businesses and investors will make firm not anymore microscopic to a few conglomerates on the Global Marketplace: the medium to small companies because of the new technologies will be able to provide sufficient products and services globally. 3. Manufacturing is no more driving force of the economy: Global Investing and Intellectual properties are becoming the driven forces;
Life as we know it is changing and the change will accelerate.
The most advance countries in this environment will be the one having the best developed system to make the best conditions for these new developments to flourish.
Eu has very well regulated economics but the nationalism, chauvinism and overextended governmental control over the firm are stoppers existing from a former Cilod and do not allow the flexibilities needed for potential amelioration for this new Cilod. Still Eu has better then the Us regulated economics which reflects the devaluation of the Us dollar to the euro.
China's economics is a aggregate of free market and socialism, and is well based on the hard working population which had been isolated from the rest of the world for hundreds of years the Chinese have cultural differences from the rest which well work well in their current organization. The huge size of the population and the market attracts foreign venture and foreign corporation which allows the Chinese government to regulate the economics. Communists and socialists' economics are pro provide economics but the distribution of wealth is regulated by the governments which gives them a pro examine market abilities. Their qoute was and always will be the microscopic flexibilities to act properly to adapt to the rapidly changing realities: when ideology plays regulative role and ideologies as usual are not market driven; also because they limit personal freedoms it affects the horizons of firm expansion.
What is the Current International Level of amelioration and how the most feasible Economics could be determined?
This is a Million dollars examine and the whole study of "Philosophy of the Economy" is to effort answering it. One thing for sure in order this to be done an assessment of historical processes of amelioration shall be done which must clarify and trace historical changes and their relativity if any.
Chapter Ii History of Development
When Karl Marx proclaimed the struggle between of the having and having not as a main force for amelioration he was wrong it is a struggle but it is between the private Desire for Competition and Group Tools of Suppression and Limiting of Individuals' access to such competition carefully socially unacceptable at inevitable historical point. When John Lock proclaimed the market competition of a provide to examine based on a Scarce Resources provide driven Religious doctrine he was wrong because even at the time his Religious doctrine was adequately reflecting the driving free market economics he could not oversee the arrival of a pro market driven examine to provide balanced Economics. The scares resources is a historical justification of suppression of Individuals Desire to Compete: putting this statement from Group Relativity prospective such suppression had inevitable competing effect for maintaining Group Stability at any historical occasion until most modern global situation. So the Marx's upper Classes in historical prospective had inevitable effect on amelioration by establishing needed for maintaining such amelioration Group Stability. At the same time the market competition of John Lock was a revolution by itself arrival from a feudalistic structured Europe into a pro market driven world where the market adjustments were based on economics not on Kings orders. Things were changing a new Current International Level of amelioration was arriving.
What is a Current International Level of amelioration Cilod and how it changes?
A probable historical duration when under the circumstances singular private skills were carefully effective for a community or country thus the community or country's tolerated and promoted such private competition to verbalize internal stability and advance in the regional or international competition.
Usually changing Cilod are painful processes of changing classes' buildings and redistribution of wealth thus wars, revolutions and Group unrest have been a good indicator for changing Cilod. The approaching new Cilod is prompted by the new valued private skills and knowledge needed under the new developments for a community or country to verbalize internal stability and advance internationally;
Two things are of high significance at this time of change from one Cilod to another the Real Possibilities which reflect the socio-economic developments of a Cilod and also the Individuals Expectations which at time of change are getting higher: there is a relation between these two Relativities thus they normally closely effect one another: the expending Real Possibilities unlashes the constant private Desires for greater free time of competition: the general direction of such competition is directed by the Real Possibilities and the current at the time potential spheres of competition: thus if we go back in history at feudal times the private Desires were much separate from these in the 18 Century Empires of Europe and these from 20 Century Japan and even further separate from the Post Wars Most developed Countries;
The Religious doctrine of the Economy distinguishes and summarize these differences to show a very singular patterns in the world history which until now have been seen from other angles; by showing such changes it capitalizes of the permanently expanding role of the private Intellectual Abilities and the new historical role they are to play in the permanently changing new world.
From another side, if societies/countries do not adapt to the emerging new socio-economic accents they may loose competitiveness and even further disintegrate and become unstable.
Philosophy of the Economy is a philosophical plan of locating the historical Cilod and the associated private /for private countries/ Current Levels of amelioration and thus showing a separate way of such evaluations from the used socio-economic philosophical conceptions up to date. This new way is progressively distinguishing itself from socio-economic ideologies, nationalism, racism or any products of the Scarce Resources Economics philosophies; it is founded on the most modern socio-economic changes in the Worlds Markets and establishes a new plan for sustained market amelioration for the Most developed Countries and Blocks and for any other countries and even individuals into the new Globalizing market and World.
The history of the world is a history of changing priorities of the role of individuals in societies: the private Desire to Compete for socio economic success as a natural human reaction in life and Societies' from other side have established cultural and regulatory systems to keep this competition under appropriate limits.
Follow up: Part Two
doctrine of the economy Part One
Post a Comment